CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING USE OF
EMPLOYMENT & NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTS
- Why Bother With a Non-Solicitation Agreement?
- Protect your confidential, proprietary and trade secret
information from wrongful use or disclosure to anyone including
competitors.
- Protect your investment in the company.
- Protect your investment in the employee.
- Set an example for other employees.
- Maintain corporate integrity.
- Non-Compete/Non-Solicitation Agreements distinguished: Non-Compete
Agreements prohibit competition with your company and must be reasonable
in time (duration) and geographic scope. Non-Solicitation
Agreements prohibit your employees (and former employees) from soliciting
your customers (no geographic scope).
- One of the best tools available to protect the legitimate business
interests of your company.
- Will not be enforced so as to prevent the employee from making a living.
- Courts balance the interest of the employer protecting its confidential
and proprietary information with the interest of the employee in making
a living.
- Carefully drafted, fair, Non-Solicitation Agreements are generally
enforceable. (Caveat: Ability to enforce will vary from state to state).
Like any contract, they require consideration; some form
of value given in exchange for employees agreement, not to compete/solicit;
employment/cash or both.
- At the inception of employment, the consideration can be employment
itself. In some states, like Minnesota, once employment has begun, a
Non-Solicitation Agreement will be valid only if the employee is paid
something extra that he or she would not have been entitled to receive,
before signing the Agreement.
- Courts generally do not like Non-Compete/Non-Solicitation Agreements
because they are a restraint of trade. Attitudes of courts
vary from neutral, to very negative, depending on state in which enforcement
is sought.
- Restrictions in Non-Solicitation and Non-Compete Agreements must have
some reasonable relationship to the business interests to be protected.
- It is generally easier to enforce a Non-Solicitation Agreement than
a Non-Compete Agreement (avoids the geographic issue). (Employers
strongest position to enforce either type of agreement occurs on purchase/acquisition
of business). In either type of Agreement, you should:
- Define customers.
- Businesses with whom you have conducted services within the last
12-24 months.
- Prospects called on or solicited by your employee (former employee)
in the last 12-24 months of employment.
- A non-solicitation clause prohibiting your former employee from
hiring your key employees should also be included. Solicitation
of your employees by a former employee may constitute breach of
the Non-Solicitation Agreement, as well as constitute wrongful interference
with contractual relationships.
- NOTE: Competitors attempting to hire away your key employees may
be subject to wrongful interference with existing contract claims.
This legal right of action varies from state to state.
- Wrongful interference with prospective contracts may in some states
give rise to a legal claim against an interfering employee or competitor.
- The Agreement should provide prohibitions against the use or disclosure
of confidential/ proprietary information. Careful definitions of confidential
or proprietary information are needed. For example, consider the following:
- Operating policies and procedures.
- Computer data bases.
- Computer software.
- Computer software development and utilization.
- Computer source codes.
- Financial records.
- Financial and operating controls and procedures.
- Contracts and agreements of all kinds, including those with customers
and vendors.
- Pricing, marketing, sales services, sales and customer lists.
- Identities of customers and customer contacts.
- Identities of customer prospects, special customer needs, customer
contacts.
- Technical needs/requirements of customers and prospective customers.
- Trade secrets, correspondence.
- Accounts.
- Business policies.
- Purchasing information.
- Functions and records.
- Management strategies and tactics, data, processes and procedures.
- Litigation and other legal matters and information that may be
patented, copyrighted, trademarked or otherwise constitute proprietary
information.
- Confidential Information may also include any information which
Employer obtains from another company and which Employer treats
as proprietary or designates as Confidential Information, whether
or not owned or developed by Employer.
- Confidential information may be in tangible written form, computer
data bases, or it may be represented and communicated solely by
oral expressions or business activities which are not reduced to
written form; it may be protected by patents or copyrights.
- Everything is not confidential.
- One of the most litigated issues is customer lists
- Key questionCan customer names be obtained from public
sources such as yellow pages, trade journals, Internet, or other
public sources. If their names can be easily accessed,
they are probably not confidential information or
confidential customers of yours.
- Even inside information may not be confidential,
since a shipper customer may be disclosing to each of its prospective
customers that information.
- Key questionWhat policies and procedures are in place to protect
the confidential information? (If you cannot prove the information was
treated as confidential, you are in trouble!)
- Training; written notices to employees; regularity.
- Stickers, stamps marked confidential.
- Accesspersonnel, plus physical access.
- Personnel on need-to-know basis (not everyone needs to know everything).
- Locked safes, locked boxes, locked files, locked desk drawers.
- Employee manuals/handbook stating and identifying the company policy
regarding confidentiality. This helps prove you treated information
as confidentialan element of evidence/proof.
- Computer databasesaccess, access codes, tracking
use, written programs and manuals, a copyright notice should be
placed on software, screens, and any written material. File for
copyright protection. It is inexpensive and a smart way to protect
your computerized data.
- For-hire letters written or included in contracts
for those who provide software services to your organization. This
is a common source of serious litigation. If you are hiring outside
software writing companies, or you have hired an MIS or software
writer, have them sign for hire letters, to make sure
that you own all rights to source code.
- Note, the violation, or unauthorized taking or use, disclosure
of copyrighted (or trademarked) materials may constitute a violation
of federal law, the Lanham Act, and may constitute violation of
unfair competition, copyright and trademark laws. Those laws provide
serious penalties including the recovery of attorneys fees
in the event you have to resort to litigation to protect your information.
- Enforcement: Breach of contracthow do you enforce it?
- You must start a lawsuit with a request/motion to the
Court to enjoin the prohibited activity (a TRO temporary restraining
order). The TRO is a drastic remedy and not easy to get. Employers
must prove (burden of proof):
- The nature of the relationship between the parties (appropriate
circumstances, what is the employers investment in the
employee? What does he or she know? What is it that the employer
seeks to protect?
- What is the harm to the employer if the TRO is denied versus
what harm does the employee get subjected to if the TRO is granted
pending further action?
- Likelihood of success on the merits.
- Public interest.]
- The administrative burdens of enforcement.
- A court will consider all of these elements before it makes its
final decision to either grant or deny the temporary restraining
order. Essentially, the employer has the burden of proving all of
these elements and make a persuasive showing that failure to issue
the temporary restraining order may subject it to irreparable harm.
The purpose of the temporary restraining order is to prevent the
employee (former employee) from interfering with your business,
by violating the terms of your non-solicitation agreement. If a
temporary restraining order is granted, the employee or former employee
who is violating the contract will be subjected to the Court Order
prohibiting him or her from taking any further action which may
harm your company until a further evidentiary hearing is held. At
the evidentiary hearing (usually scheduled within 30-45 days of
the issuance of a TRO), the parties present evidence to support
their claims, with the employer seeking a permanent injunction,
prohibiting the employee (former employee) from violating the terms
of the non-solicitation agreement.
- How do you prove these elements?
- You need reliable witnesses. Hearsay will not work!
- You will need affidavits, sworn statements from persons who have
first-hand knowledge of the behavior which you claim violates your
contract. Typically, your customers may be the first to tell you
that a former employee is now soliciting them. This can be very
touchy. Most customers do not want to get involved in your lawsuits.
However, sometimes they will provide you with an affidavit that
at least factually will corroborate your claim that a former employee
is soliciting them. You will need to prove what was taken, that
it was used or disclosed without your knowledge or consent, and
that it was confidential information as defined in your
non-solicitation agreement.
- If you can prove that any of the information was taken from your
facilities in physical form, that will be even stronger evidence
of the violation of the contract. For example, if someone has taken
computer disks, tapes, printouts, internal pricing strategies in
written form, down-loaded computer information, taken hardware,
customer lists, phone numbers, private information, accounting information,
etc., you may have a better chance of success. Note, you cannot
stop them from using what is their heads.
- Direct evidence is better than circumstantial evidence.
- NOTE, if the employee has gone to work for a competitor, you may
be able to take legal action against the competitor for wrongful
interference of contracts. Generally, competitors do not want to
get involved in a lawsuit protecting a new employee, particularly
if the employee failed to disclose the existence of the non-solicitation
contract. That could result in the employees immediate dismissal.
Sometimes, however, competitors encourage such employees to join
the team against another company. In that instance, the competitor
may be a good target for a wrongful interference with contract claim.
- The purpose of the legal action is to prevent a former employee
from soliciting your customers, or using or disclosing your confidential
information. The likelihood of collecting damages is not very likely,
unless copyrighted, patented or trademark information is taken.
- Choice of Law Issues:
- Generally, we try to include the name of the home state base of
operations as the controlling law state. However, if it is likely
that you will be enforcing the contract in another state, it is
very wise to make sure that your contract complies with the law
of that state. Each state has its own peculiarities and quirks and
thus it is essential that you have your attorney check the laws
of the state in which you anticipate you may have to enforce the
agreement. One size does not fit all.
- Who Should Sign the Agreement:
- Key employees, managers, better psychological benefits.
- When: At inception of employment, or at a later date (better at
inception).
- Managers: You must be consistent in its use or you may be faced
with discrimination claims. If you want managers/supervisors to
sign, make sure all of them sign.
- If you want to introduce a new contract now, what about your current
employees? Generally, after the inception of employment, you will
have to pay something extra, some additional consideration, in order
to make the contract valid.
- Trade secrets:
- Most states have adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets law. Under
the Trade Secrets Act, you can obtain injunctive relief (a restraining
order), damages and attorneys fees. Damages, where the taking
and misuse of the trade secret is particularly egregious may result
in a recovery of double damages.
- The enforcement of the trade secrets statutes does not involve
a balancing of the interests of the employee against the interest
of the employer. If the misappropriation of the trade secret is
proven, then the person and perhaps the corporation involved in
taking it will be liable.
- Definition of trade secret: A trade secret means information,
including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method,
technique or process that (1) derives independent economic value,
actual or potential, from not being generally known to and not being
readily ascertainable by proper means by other persons who can obtain
economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) is the subject
of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain
its secrecy. In Minnesota, the statute adds the following paragraph:
The existence of a trade secret is not negated merely because
an employee or other person has acquired the trade secret without
express or specific notice that it is a trade secret if under all
the circumstances the employee or other person knows or has reason
to know that the owner intends or expects the secrecy of the type
of information comprising the trade secret to be maintained.
All Rights Reserved R.H. Usem 2001
◄back
to Transportation News and Updates